Re: Build diary
Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 3:20 pm
I have built 4. Two RHDs, two LHDs. Two of which were complete tear downs and re assembly. One was a newly assembled RHD, the other, the US distributor's LHD press car. .
The problems were, well, numerous. The new car I rebuilt was a typical "powder coat" restoration. Old parts painted and installed. Everything needed to be rebuilt, including the parts that were supposedly "rebuilt"
By everything, I mean the rear axle, front spindles an king pins (one spindle was stripped on the new build, the wheel held in place by the brake caliper!), engine, differential, electrics. Only the transmission was OK, but it was banging against the chassis.
But the bigger problem than build quality is the car's setup. Most are simply undrivable when finished.
The biggest flaw is usually ride height. Nobody sets the car up with the driver in it, and the chassis all seem to be set at 3" in front, and less than 5" in the rear. The steering wont usually return, the king pins are too tight, the toe is always set to about 3/4" OUT. The handling? Well, the ride is punishing and the steering is really twitchy with a pull to the right (LHD or RHD. Don't know why, but it is always fixed once I finish the chassis setup). Often the wrong steering rack is installed with incorrect front steering arms. Dampers are usually turned up full stiff, and there is no useful suspension travel. Some of the cars had gone through 3 owners in less than 5 months. No wonder!
It's not that these things are occasional problems, They are problems with EVERY car that I see, except for those that I have set up.
We don't have an fascist IVA here. There is only minimal inspection of kit cars in the US, which I find refreshing. But the builders really need to understand that putting the car together means more than just assembling the parts. It has to be developed and adjusted. Most home builders are not experienced enough to do that. I help out the best that I can.
The problems were, well, numerous. The new car I rebuilt was a typical "powder coat" restoration. Old parts painted and installed. Everything needed to be rebuilt, including the parts that were supposedly "rebuilt"
By everything, I mean the rear axle, front spindles an king pins (one spindle was stripped on the new build, the wheel held in place by the brake caliper!), engine, differential, electrics. Only the transmission was OK, but it was banging against the chassis.
But the bigger problem than build quality is the car's setup. Most are simply undrivable when finished.
The biggest flaw is usually ride height. Nobody sets the car up with the driver in it, and the chassis all seem to be set at 3" in front, and less than 5" in the rear. The steering wont usually return, the king pins are too tight, the toe is always set to about 3/4" OUT. The handling? Well, the ride is punishing and the steering is really twitchy with a pull to the right (LHD or RHD. Don't know why, but it is always fixed once I finish the chassis setup). Often the wrong steering rack is installed with incorrect front steering arms. Dampers are usually turned up full stiff, and there is no useful suspension travel. Some of the cars had gone through 3 owners in less than 5 months. No wonder!
It's not that these things are occasional problems, They are problems with EVERY car that I see, except for those that I have set up.
We don't have an fascist IVA here. There is only minimal inspection of kit cars in the US, which I find refreshing. But the builders really need to understand that putting the car together means more than just assembling the parts. It has to be developed and adjusted. Most home builders are not experienced enough to do that. I help out the best that I can.